Like I posted in the Vote for Bush topic, what you get from the media is very distorted. Probably even more so overseas. TV, film, magazines, etc. are all concentrated in New York and Los Angeles for the most part, which happen to be probably the most liberal parts of the U.S. For some reason, every actor and musician has felt the need to get political over the past couple of years...almost to the point that if you were in these professions and spoke up for Bush it could be career suicide. And these people have always been far to the left, socially and politically. So, many people here are trying to portray Bush as a despot, so I can't imagaine what it is like over there.
I know Europe, compared to the U.S., is more liberal and more progressive. Religion is kind of on the way out when compared to the U.S. So, his conservatism might not be too appealing to you all.
I am not at all surprised people overseas hate Bush. War is a messy business. In addition, Bush happens to be inarticulate and isn't too quick on his feet, which makes him come across like more of an idiot. But, I think (my opinion), John Kerry is one of the biggest political opportunists if there was one. He was once quoted saying, "I thought it would be doubly advantageous to serve in the war (Vietnam) and come back and protest it." Political opportunism-check. He was on the Senate Intelligence Committee, which had a huge part in us going to war. He voted for us to go to war, but wouldn't fund it. So he was for the war and against it at the same time. Bush calls it "flip-flopping," I call it political opportunism. That way, when the election came, he could take which ever side was favorable depending on how the war went. He was quoted in 2002 saying Sadaam was a threat that must be removed and it would be foolish to think otherwise. He's not as true as you may think. He has a long Senate voting record to prove it.
In hindsight it is easy for Kerry to say he opposed the war in Iraq and that he would have done things differently and better, but come on, would he really? Imagine being president after seeing 3,000 innocent civilians attacked for no reason except the hate from some Islamic fundamentalist. You want to do everything in your power to protect your country. You look somewhere that has always had conflict with the U.S. in this regard. That was Iraq. We had bad intelligence, from the U.S. and other countries, and we acted on it. Yes, we defied the UN but we also had allies. Our government voted to go in and we did and it was a bust. We are trying to fight the terrorists and it's ugly. War always is. I can't really defend the war but I don't think Bush went into the war just to pick a fight. The war was swift and went well at first. Sadaam was gone. Hardly any casualties. But, we didn't expect what would happen. Poor foresight on our part.
The thing with Kerry is that his rhetoric really does change with the polls. He is a politician in every sense of the word. With Bush, what you see is what you get. You might not like what you see. But maybe what you all see on TV and in newspapers is what Americans and the rest of the world really aren't getting.
The deciding factor for me in this election was the economy and domestic policy, and I have always been a Republican in that sense. Less government is more when it comes to economics in my opinion. I consider myself a social liberal however, in that I support abortion, stem-cell research, etc. However, I oppose gay marriage. I actually have a question for you non-Americans. How does your country handle that issue or is it even an issue?
I will stop.