Depersonalization Support Forum banner

For rula

1606 Views 16 Replies 3 Participants Last post by  orlando
Hi rula

Yes I am still around. I can't remember the questions I asked you in the post you referred to as I am not sure how to go about finding it since I don't remember how long ago it was that i posted it. But I would be interested in hearing your answers. It probably had to do with benzos, but am not sure.

I haven't been posting much recently. I have been feeling O.K. as far as DP/DR goes but I have been somewhat depressed in recent days, mostly do to with real life circumstances. Growing old, a bankruptcy hearing coming up soon, not having reliable transportation, loneliness, and things that most people would likely feel a bit saddened by. I appreciated hearing from you. And would like to hear your thoughts to my questions.

Here is a somewhat off topic article I found disturbing for a variety of different reasons, and thought you and others here might find interesting and thought provoking as well. Particularly for parents and children here in the U.S.

Mental Health Screening in Schools Signals the End of Parental Rights
Nancy Levant

"In the 2005-2006 school year, all parents will receive written notice of new policies from your children?s schools. Many schools will ask you to sign permission slips, allowing school counselors or ?advocates? to have conversations with your children. You will be told how your local schools are now involved in vision and dental screenings, learning disabilities and speech impediment screenings, and other acts of kindness, but watch for the small print or the extra little blurb, which states that your children will also be evaluated for emotional wellness. Watch for wording like ?happiness indicators? or ?family participation.?

The fact is that our president has mandated that every American child, age 3 through 18, is federally ordered to be evaluated for mental health issues and to receive ?enforced? treatment. Welcome to President Bush?s New Freedom Initiative and New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. Welcome to life-long profiling and drug addictions, New Freedom-style.

52 million students and six million adults working in schools, according to this commission, will be tested and should flush out at least 6 million people, or shall we say new customers, who will then be mandated to receive ?treatment.? What treatment does our president?s commission have in mind? The newest drugs in the pharmaceutical pipelines, of course. The commission recommends ?specific medications for specific conditions.?

One of the state-of-the-art treatments, and most expensive, is an implanted capsule ? yes, that?s right, implanted. The capsule delivers medication into a child?s body without the child having to swallow a pill or the need for parental permission for dispensation.

The New Freedom Commission named the Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP) a model treatment plan. Medical algorithms are a flowchart-style treatment indicator. If you have A symptom and B symptom, take C medication. TMAP began with the University of Texas, big pharma, and the mental health and corrections system in Texas. The American Psychiatric Association concurs that TMAP is brilliant.

However, the New Freedom Initiative and Commission is a political-big pharma marriage. Many companies who supported TMAP were also major contributors to Bush?s re-election funds. For example, Eli Lilly manufactures olanzapine - one of the drugs recommended in the New Freedom plan, and furthermore, George Herbert Walker Bush was once a member of Lilly?s board of directors. Our current President Bush appointed Lilly?s chief executive officer, Sidney Taurel, as a member of the Homeland Security Council. Eighty-two percent of Lilly?s $1.6 million in political contributions in 2000 went to Bush and the Republican Party. Do tell?

Texas Algorithm grossed over 4 billion dollars in 2003 and olanzapine is Eli Lilly's top selling drug. A 2003 New York Times article by Gardiner Harris claims that 70 percent of olanzapine sales are paid for by government agencies, such as Medicare and Medicaid. And lo and behold, guess who is now able to bill Medicaid for health services? Public schools, of course, as they are now under the big pharma-political profits/pay-back umbrella once they adopt screening policies. Public schools can now be paid to screen and drug your kids.

Now, if you ever wonder, ever again, if public-private partnerships care about people, then you need a brain transplant. Your children are now the legislated guinea pigs and lab rats for the pharmaceutical companies who bought and paid for our president?s campaign. Favors are now returned to those companies in the form of enforced, juvenile customers, their health, and their future drug addictions.

But wait, there is more. The New Freedom Commission also calls for enforced treatment. That means that parents have no rights to refuse the treatment recommenced by TMAP and other drug dispensing corporate-bureaucratic apparatuses. And as the mental health bureaucracy is also involved in this financial game of insidious cruelty, parents and families are also to be investigated via the result of their children?s screenings in schools. In other words, schools are now the across-the board, or shall I say nation, diagnostic tool for big pharma and child control.

And there?s more. The U.N. Agenda 21 has also called for total intrusion into schools and children lives. No more religion, no more individuality, no more real education, no more real grades, no more real teaching, no more teacher respect for parents, and no more truth from teachers or principals. This sounds very familiar and very political to me. And I?ve said it before, and I will say it again: if you are of a religious ilk and you refuse to allow your children to be abused by our ?educational? system, the stage is being set for you to lose physical custody of your children. I suggest that you read this: Rethinking Orphanages for the 21st Century by Richard McKenzie, ed

Still got your kids in public schools? Shame on you, and may God bless your poor children and forgive you. "

Source: ... _25370.htm
See less See more
1 - 4 of 17 Posts
Yeah, horrible idea.

Just think if the two disturbed boys at Columbine and all the others who rampaged recently had been forced to get help in order to protect the public (not to mention make it possible for them to live worthwhile lives). That would be a terrible outcome, right? Their parents were too stupid (or probably mentally ill themselves) to see their children were mad.

I'm glad the government will do what stupid or sick parents cannot -- protect the innocent from the deranged among us.

I don't think "enforcement" would become an issue unless the child was a danger, and I think people who are afraid of this law need their mental health checked -- they're paranoid.

To automatically assume the government will secretly start drugging your child is stupid, too. Very stupid.

As long as parents in this country irresponsibly have children and then neglect them to the degree that turn into monsters, the government needs to protect the rest of us.
The article is clearly biased; I would read the law itself to determine what it really says.

Just like the hue and cry over the Patriot Act, this is probably a tempest in a teapot. Some people were claiming the FBI could just barge in and search your house under the Patriot Act. That proved to be a bald-faced lie. A federal judge needs to approve a search warrant.

If there are no provisions for input by parents at all, I would agree that is bad, but I don't know that for a fact, and neither do you.

There are probably adequate provisions for parent input and opportunities for negotiation.

One cannot base one's opinion on an article like that. Well, you can, of course, but it's just not smart.
I did a little research and found that evidently there was no provision for parent input.

In Illinois, the state amended its law:

Replaces everything. Amends the Children's Mental Health Act of 2003. Provides that any screening services provided under the Children's Mental Health Plan must be voluntary and conducted with parental consent and in accordance with the Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Code. Effective immediately.

See ... ssionID=50

So each state has to do what's necessary.
You didn't know the facts for sure. You took the word of a biased newspaper. All you had was that article.

But I did the research and reported that evidently there weren't any protection in the law. So I was wrong.

I apologize for calling you those things. Perhaps your calling Bush what you did riled me. I shouldn't have responded in kind, but people keep telling me I'm a fallible human and I guess I let it go to my head.

I am sorry; I am sure you are quite intelligent.

Please forgive me.
1 - 4 of 17 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.